![]() In recent years, the committee has even added the rapid spread of disinformation to its growing list of existential threats to humanity. “Climate change, biological threats, artificial intelligence-there are lots of emerging issues that could threaten the planet,” says Mecklin. Now, the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board considers more than just the nuclear threat when deciding where to set the clock’s hands each year. When the clock was first depicted on the June 1947 issue-set at seven minutes to midnight-the editors were concerned solely with the likelihood that atomic bombs would soon rain down on the world’s capitals. That’s a pretty grim way to celebrate your 75th birthday, but as Bulletin editor John Mecklin observes, the ingredients for a possible doomsday scenario are more numerous than ever. The clock is reset every January, and not even at the height of the Cold War, when Americans were digging fallout shelters and kids were being told to “duck and cover” under their school desks in case of atomic attack, were the clock’s hands this far into the final countdown. The iconic clock has been the symbol of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientistsever since, and on its 75th anniversary the group’s experts say we’re closer than ever to that dreadful wakeup call. In 1947, a group of scientists who had worked on the first nuclear weapons dreamed up the Doomsday Clock as a metaphor warning just how close humanity was to destroying itself. put it another way: “It's the End of the World as We Know It.” That’s the interval on the symbolic Doomsday Clock between the present moment and “planetary catastrophe.” The alternative rock band R.E.M. “I’m hoping that there can be some kind of internal discussion that might lead to, you know, more freedom, but also less oppression,” she said.Regardless of what your watch tells you, it’s 100 seconds to midnight. That doesn’t mean that we are going to overthrow the regime and they are going to leave peacefully,” Clinton told CNN. ![]() “You can’t premise a theocracy on covering up women’s hair. Not just within the government, but more importantly with the clerics to say that this is not sustainable.” “We’re sending a message to whoever the few possibly concerned people are about what’s happening to the tens of thousands of Iranians being imprisoned, and the many hundreds who are being killed, that maybe they are willing inside to speak out. I think we’re doing something else,” Clinton said. In October, Rob Malley, the US special envoy for Iran, said the US would not “waste our time” on nuclear talks with Iran and instead focus on issues “where we can be useful.” State Department spokesman Ned Price also said in October the administration’s focus “is on the remarkable bravery and courage that the Iranian people are exhibiting through their peaceful demonstrations, through their exercise of their universal right to freedom of assembly and to freedom of expression.”Ĭlinton emphasized her support for focusing on the protestors on Thursday, saying that the United States should not “look like we are seeking an agreement at a time when the people of Iran are standing up to their oppressors.” Officials from a Western country that closely monitors Iran’s weapons program previously told CNN that Iran was preparing to send roughly 1,000 additional weapons, including more attack drones and short-range ballistic missiles, to Moscow to assist its invasion of Ukraine.īoth of those issues have brought chances of talks about the nuclear deal with Iran to a halt. In addition to Iranian authorities’ brutal crackdown on protesters, the US has also taken issue with the country’s cooperation with Russia during the war in Ukraine. And I believe that they started those centrifuges spinning again.”ĭiscussions between the US and Iran on the 2015 nuclear deal, called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA, have been pushed to the sidelines since protests erupted across Iran following the death of Mahsa Amini, a young Kurdish Iranian woman who was arrested by the morality police for allegedly not wearing her hijab correctly. “When Trump pulled us out,” she said, “we lost the eyes that we had on what they were doing inside Iran. “I would not be negotiating with Iran on anything right now, including the nuclear agreement ,” Clinton told CNN’s Christiane Amanpour on Thursday, adding that the horse is “out of the barn.” The US should not be negotiating with Iran “on anything right now,” including a nuclear agreement, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |